Jump to Navigation
Jump to Content

State-based retirement plans for the private sector

Date Published: 
Thursday, May 8, 2014

There is a movement afoot to use the efficiencies of public retirement systems to administer new types of pension plans for private-sector workers. Below are brief summaries of the plans being considered:


California

On September 28, 2012, Governor Jerry Brown signed into law S.B. 1234, the California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Trust Act. The bill, which was sponsored by Senator Kevin de Leόn, will eventually require that all businesses with five or more employees that do not already offer a retirement plan enroll them in a new type of savings plan based on Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs). 

California Secure Choice accounts differ from IRAs in several ways. The new system’s investments would be professionally managed by the California Public Employees' Retirement System or another contracted organization. Employees would be automatically enrolled in the plan and would contribute about three percent of their wages through payroll deduction, although they could opt out of the plan. A modest benefit would be guaranteed through underwriting by private insurers, and not by taxpayers.

Employers would not have any fiduciary liability involving the fund; their sole requirement is to assist their employees by permitting them to use their payroll-deduction systems to make retirement fund contributions.

To date, the State has established the California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Investment Board and the California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Trust, as required by the statute. The Board has begun work on the market analysis and the feasibility study that are required before the new savings accounts can be established.


Connecticut

SB 249, an Act Promoting Retirement Savings, was introduced into the Connecticut General Assembly in February 2014 by Representative Joe Aresimowicz and Senator Martin Looney. The bill was voted out of the Labor and Public Employees Committee in March. Key provisions of the bill were incorporated into Connecticut’s "budget implementer" bill, which was approved by the legislature and sent to the Governor’s desk on May 7, 2014. 

The legislation dedicates $400,000 toward the establishment of a Connecticut Retirement Security Board and directs the Board to conduct a market feasibility study and create a comprehensive implementation plan for a new state-administered retirement program. The implementation plan must be submitted to the Governor and General Assembly for final approval by April 2016.  

If approved, the implementation plan would create an automatic IRA that would be administered by the appointed trust fund board, as in California. Employers with five or more workers would be required to participate unless they offer a different retirement savings plan to their employees. Unlike most IRAs bought in the private market, the money would be paid out as a lifetime annuity with an option for workers to select a lump-sum, helping to ensure that people will not outlive their assets while preserving worker’s ability to choose the option best suited to their financial needs. Finally, a modest guarantee and low fees would protect the money saved by hard-working employees. 

Read a more detailed summary of the Connecticut legislation.


Illinois

In January 2014, SB 2758, an Act creating the Illinois Secure Choice Savings Program, was introduced into the Illinois General Assembly by Senator Daniel Bliss. The bill passed the Illinois Senate on April 9 and is currently pending in the House Rules Committee.

SB 2758 establishes a payroll-deduction IRA for workers whose employers do not offer any other retirement savings vehicle in the workplace. The bill requires all businesses in existence at least two years with 25 or more employees to automatically enroll their employees in the Secure Choice Savings Program unless they offer another retirement option to their workers. 

Employees can choose to opt out of the program at any time, and they can determine a contribution level and select among a small number of investment options. A default contribution level of three percent of salary is offered to those who do not select one on their own, as is a default life-cycle investment fund for those who do not choose one from the options offered. Assets are pooled into a single fund and managed by the Illinois Treasurer and a qualified board, providing participants the benefit of low fees and competitive investment performance.  


Maryland 

In January 2014, Senator James Rosapepe introduced SB 921, the Maryland Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program and Trust, in the Maryland State Senate. Delegate Tom Hucker introduced a companion bill HB 1251 in the Maryland Assembly. SB 921 was the subject of a hearing in the Senate Budget and Taxation Committee on February 20. 

The bill would provide a retirement savings plan to employees of private-sector employers with at least five employees that do not already provide an employer-sponsored retirement or pension plan. Eligible employers would be required to make the program available to their employees through payroll deduction. Employees are required to participate unless they opt out.  Before the plan could go into effect, it must secure tax-favored qualification from the Internal Revenue Service and it must be determined that the plan is not subject to the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act.  


Massachusetts

In March 2012, Massachusetts enacted HR 3754, an Act Providing Retirement Options for Nonprofit Organizations. The new law allows the State Treasurer to sponsor a retirement savings plan for workers at small non-profit organizations in the Commonwealth. The retirement plan would be a tax-qualified defined contribution arrangement with various investment options available to employees. Contributions could be made by workers, their employers, or both. A “not-for-profit defined contribution committee” of five members would be established to assist the State Treasurer in developing policy and providing technical advice for the plan. The plan would be marketed particularly to nonprofits with 20 or fewer employees.

The Massachusetts plan has been developed and is currently pending before the Internal Revenue Service for final authorization. 


Minnesota

On February 27, 2014, SF 2078, Minnesota Secure Choice Retirement Savings Plan Establishment, was introduced in the Minnesota State Senate by Senator Sandra L. Pappas. The bill passed the State and Local Government Committee on March 12 and was referred to the Commerce Committee.  The Commerce Committee passed the bill on March 26 and referred it to the Finance Committee, where it is currently pending. 

The Minnesota Secure Choice Plan bill would require the Commissioner of Management and Budget to report to the legislature by January 2015 on the potential establishment of a state-administered retirement savings plan to serve employees without access to another retirement savings plan. 


Nebraska

On December 10, 2013, the Retirement Systems Committee of the Nebraska Legislature held a hearing to discuss LR 344, a resolution calling for an interim study to examine the availability and adequacy of retirement savings for Nebraska’s private-sector workers. The hearing was hosted by Committee Chair Senator Jeremy Nordquist.


Oregon

On July 7, 2013, Oregon’s state legislature passed HB 3436, which creates a task force to explore options for helping private-sector workers who lack access to a workplace retirement plan save for retirement. The bill is now awaiting the governor’s signature. 

Sponsored by Representative Jules Bailey, Senator Lee Beyer, and Senate Majority Leader Diane Rosenbaum, HB 3436 authorizes the creation of a seven-person task force that will develop recommendations on ways to increase the number of Oregonians saving for retirement through new structures that could be facilitated by the state. The task force’s report is due September 1, 2014.

The task force is headed by Oregon Treasurer Ted Wheeler, who was named Elected Official of the Year by the National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems in January 2014, in recognition of his efforts to help people save for retirement. Mr. Wheeler also convened a bi-partisan roundtable in New York City of union representatives, financial services leaders, and state treasurers to discuss whether new options are needed to help workers save.  

 
Washington

On January 17, 2014, HB 2474 was introduced by Representative Larry Springer in the Washington House of Representatives, and Senator Mark Mullet introduced a companion bill, SB 6294, in the Senate. Hearings were held on the bill in the House Appropriations Committee on January 28, 2014, and a substitute bill passed the Committee on February 11 and was referred to the Rules Committee. The Rules Committee passed the bill on February 14 and referred it to the Senate Committee on Financial Institutions, Housing & Insurance. This Committee referred the bill back to the House Rules Committee for a third reading on March 13, 2014.


Wisconsin

On February 17, 2014, Senator Dave Hansen introduced SB 611, a bill creating a Wisconsin private retirement security board that would study the feasibility of establishing a private security retirement plan for private-sector workers and designing a plan to submit to the legislature. The bill failed to pass before the legislature adjourned for the year.  

Print-Friendly Version [PDF]

print